Search Results

A selective immigration policy is one that nations adopt out of necessity because the sheer attraction a country receives from Immigrants far exceeds the actual sentiment towards foreigners that the society can accept. The win-win for governments whose hands are forced to prioritise commercial and economonical interests over societal sentiments dictates that they have to carefully choose and admit individuals based on very specific criteria - typically to address economic, demographic, or social objectives. Such policies aim to attract immigrants who can contribute positively to the host country's development and meet particular needs over a 10-20 year horizon. Selective immigration policies often involve criteria such as education, skills, work experience, language proficiency, and other qualifications. It is no different in Singapore, or especially in Singapore, considering its size and capacity where the government has acknowledged that they will be looking to onboard foreign talent strategicially - ie, individuals that 'complements the local talent pool'. Lack of Transparency Makes Application Outcomes a Black Hole From the immigrants' perspective, Singapore's immigration policies in the past decade or so has been nothing short of frustrating. Despite their high qualifications, income package and skillsets, rejections remain rife. On the flip side, some immigrant hopefuls have anecdotally reported how some of their 'lesser' colleagues have received approvals on their applications. With absolutely no reasons for rejection provided by the ICA - Singapore's government body administrating applications, hopeful applicants are left speculating on the reasons for rejection or approvals. Despite multiple attempts and spending time and resource to ingrain into the society, it seems their application is simply a stab in the dark and lost in the void of a massive black hole. Surely, there ought to be a better way for applicants to have a better understanding of their path towards Singapore permanent residency or Citizenship? Adding some Colour into the Black Hole In a written reply to Parliamentary Question on Unsuccessful Permanent Residency Applications, Mr K Shanmugam, Minister for Home Affairs and Minister for Law shared : 1. Applications for Permanent Residency (PR) are evaluated on criteria covering a range of factors. The applicant’s length of residency is only one of the factors considered by the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA). The other factors include, but are not limited to, the applicant’s family ties to Singaporeans, economic contributions, educational qualifications, age and family profile, the applicant’s ability to integrate into our society, and commitment to sinking roots in Singapore. 2. We do not share the specific grounds for rejecting PR applications. First, information about detailed assessment criteria can be abused to inflate an undeserving applicant’s chances of success or to game the system. Second, the reasons for rejection may be used to arouse negative sentiments in other countries. This may create bilateral sensitives and is not in Singapore’s interest. While the above response may seem unsatisfactory at the onset, it reiterates the notion of Singapore's country first before all else mindset. Unlike other countries who adopts a 'Points System' to administrate immigration applications, Singapore cannot accord such luxury due to its limited land space, and volume of applicants vis-a-vis the total available quota available at any one point in time. At present, the average number of Singapore PR applicants annually stands at approximately 120,000 applicants. Out of these, an average of 32,000 - 34,000 gets approved in the last 4 years, bringing the industry success rate to around 30%. The same can be said about the fate of Singapore Citizenship applications. With annual approximate applicants numbering around 60,000, of which only 21,000 - 23,000 gets approved annually. Having represented applicants from over 70 nationalities traverse these applications since 2015, my view is that should Singapore adopt a Points System, it would lead to a swift catastrophe. The sheer number of 'highly qualified' applicants would probably bring the annual approval to about 70%. That translates to about 84,000 new PRs a year introduced into Singapore. This is not a sustainable number for both infrastructure and societal mores. For now, indeed the win-win is to keep the policy status quo. Maintaining this cloak of uncertainty allows the government to ensure there is a consistent, healthy volume of highly qualified applicants so that they have the best profiles of candidates per industry and talent disposal at any given time to select from. Because Brand Singapore sells for itself, this is a policy that the Government can get away with for the time being, until a more attractive ASEAN alternative emerges. Dissecting Singapore's Selective Immigration Policy If we glean through Ministerial responses and policy papers in the last decade or so, we can derive a very practical and strategic blueprint that makes up the Selective Immigration criteria. These include, but are not limited to applicants' : Age Length of Stay in Singapore Educational qualifications Economic contributions Job experience Talent & Skillset Industry Representation Family Ties in Singapore Commitment to Sinking roots Social integration factors Clean Criminal Records Clean Family Background The approach and strategy to apply requires a highly extensive discsusion as there are no two applications that are the same. The nuanced nature of each application requires an honest, expert audit to give applicants a transparent, and realistic overview of their chances of approval. This is even more so for highly skilled and qualified individuals because of the very stiff competition amongst elite profiles. Muhammad Ryhan has extensive experience in facilitating successful pathways for individuals and businesses from diverse backgrounds into Singapore - having consistently delivered tailored solutions that align with Singapore's dynamic immigration landscape. He has provided expert insights on prominent media platforms like The Straits Times, The Business Times, and Thomson Reuters since 2014 and has ingrained into his work ethics unparalleled dedication to ensuring that your immigration journey is not just seamless but strategically aligned with your goals. Book a consultation with me today for a discussion that could redefine your future.

Singapore’s immigration requirements are extremely nuanced. The city-state’s sheer size enables it to be highly adaptable to take advantage of economic shifts, industry demands, as well as ripple effects caused by geopolitics and global catastrophes. While the immigration to economic gearing is perpetually changing, Singapore has the benefit of looking to the land of the rising sun as a clear example on how not to be late to the show in curtailing the effects of low birth rates, silver aging, and hyper globalization. Japan : The Land of the Setting Sun The steroid growth of post war industrialization in Japan is over. Culminating in the 80s and perhaps 90s, weak follow through and an infatuation to look too inwardly has sparked its own downfall. Japan has long been grappling with a slew of population challenges that have far-reaching implications for its economy, social structure, and overall well-being. One of the primary concerns is the country's aging population, coupled with a declining birth rate. Japan's birth rate has been consistently low, leading to an increasingly elderly demographic and a shrinking workforce. This demographic shift poses significant economic challenges, such as a reduced labor force, increased healthcare and pension costs, and potential stagnation in economic growth. The trend also raises concerns about social dynamics, as a larger elderly population may strain social services and impact the traditional family structure which in turn will impact quality of life. Efforts to address these population woes include government initiatives to encourage family planning, support for working parents, and immigration policies aimed at supplementing the labor force. But this is a little too late. Despite these efforts, finding a sustainable solution to Japan's demographic challenges remains an ongoing and complex task. Taking a Cherry Blossom from Japan’s failure? Singapore's notable birth rate issue has been a persistent concern for the government and policymakers. The bastard child of the ‘Stop at Two’ policy continues to haunt the nation state. In what is deemed an Uno reverse, valiant attempts at undoing the fallacy of this short sighted policy is simply not sustainable due to overall perpetual ongoing rising living costs. The country's birth rate has consistently remained below replacement levels, raising worries about its long-term demographic sustainability. Factors contributing to this issue include changing societal norms, a focus on career advancement, high costs of living, and limited work-life balance. The government has implemented various measures to encourage family formation, such as providing financial incentives, parental leave policies, and support for work-life balance. Despite these efforts, the birth rate remains a challenge, prompting a need for continued policy adjustments and societal shifts to address the complex interplay of factors influencing family planning decisions. A declining birth rate has implications for Singapore's workforce, economic growth, and social welfare systems, emphasizing the importance of finding effective and comprehensive strategies to tackle this demographic challenge. The Handy-Plast solution : Immigration With Singaporeans not keen to reproduce as quickly as the country needs it to, it has to depend on ‘surrogates’ to keep the infatuation for growth at all cost alive. Unlike Japan, Singapore’s policymakers were very quick to address its population woes. As early as the 1990s, many initiatives along with effective engineering of commercial deals have galvanized its attractiveness to gravitate foreign investments, along with talent to the red dot. It was an open door policy and remained so until the 2010’s, when for the first time, the incumbent government was rattled by local vs foreigner sentiments that could potentially cause an upset in state elections. Since then, Singapore employs a selective immigration approach to complement the local talent pool with foreign talent - attracting skilled professionals, entrepreneurs, and investors to contribute to its economic growth and development. However, core immigration policies remain a moving goal post. While Singapore's immigration policies were designed to balance economic considerations, demographic challenges, and social cohesion, it is essential to note that immigration policies will inevitably evolve along with economic requirements. Towards 2030 : Singapore’s Population Objectives The Singapore Population White Paper put together by various ministries sets out the key considerations and roadmap for Singapore’s population policies to address its demographic challenges. It outlines the Government’s policies to maintain a strong Singaporean core in the population, calibrate how many new citizens and PRs are taken in, create jobs and opportunities for Singaporeans and PRs, build a high quality living environment, as well as strengthen its identity and society. Foreigners on the yellow brick road to permanently settle in Singapore can take comfort that Singapore will continue to need the relevant talent always, across almost all industries. In a ChannelNewsAsia interview held in September 2023, Minister of Trade and Industry, Tan See Leng shared how, “Skilled foreign employees can help strengthen local workforce, transfer expertise”. After all, Singapore cannot afford to hope that birth rates miraculously multiply. Even if it did, it will be a 20 year wait before its effects can be seen in the marketplace. Muhammad Ryhan has extensive experience in facilitating successful pathways for individuals and businesses from diverse backgrounds into Singapore - having consistently delivered tailored solutions that align with Singapore's dynamic immigration landscape. He has provided expert insights on prominent media platforms like The Straits Times, The Business Times, and Thomson Reuters since 2014 and has ingrained into his work ethics unparalleled dedication to ensuring that your immigration journey is not just seamless but strategically aligned with your goals. Book a consultation with me today for a discussion that could redefine your future.